{"id":10289,"date":"2023-12-19T14:25:22","date_gmt":"2023-12-19T19:25:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/360mediations.com\/en\/?p=10289"},"modified":"2024-01-10T15:11:29","modified_gmt":"2024-01-10T20:11:29","slug":"litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/","title":{"rendered":"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>This recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt with a very heated issue that involved various intervenors who all had strong opinions on whether motions for court approvals of a settlement involving a party under disability, brought under Rule 7.08 (herein \u201c<strong>Rule 7.08 Motions<\/strong>\u201d) should be presumptively sealed in order to \u201cprotect\u201d the party under disability.<\/p>\n<p>The appellate court agreed that such motions \u201cgenerally will \u2026 include sensitive and personal information about the party whose claim is being settled,\u201d and in this digital age \u201cpersonal information made part of a public court record may be vulnerable to wider and more permanent circulation than ever before.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Despite this acknowledgement, however, the appellate court disagreed that a presumptive sealing order was required for all Rule 7.08 Motions.<\/p>\n<p>The appellate court was of the view that the presumption should be the exact opposite \u2013 court proceedings should be open to the public, including Rule 7.08 Motions. \u00a0\u00a0The appellate court reasoned that making the process presumptively confidential:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>would screen an important role of the courts from public view in a sweeping fashion;<\/li>\n<li data-viibes-parag=\"48\" data-viibes-start=\"47\" data-viibes-end=\"46\">would keep citizens uninformed of the protection provided to vulnerable parties through judicial oversight;<\/li>\n<li data-viibes-parag=\"48\" data-viibes-start=\"47\" data-viibes-end=\"46\">would prevent the public from seeing that judges are acting fairly and in a manner consistent with societal values; and<\/li>\n<li>would prevent similarly situated people from gaining an understanding of how they may be treated by the judicial process.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The appellate court was satisfied that judges had adequate discretion under Rule 7.08 to invoke orders and remedies to protect sensitive information if such was required, such as the power to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>anonymize the parties (ie: using initials instead of parties\u2019 names;<\/li>\n<li>order a publication ban;<\/li>\n<li>order some material be redacted;<\/li>\n<li>order a portion, or all, of the record be sealed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In the case before the appellate court, the motion\u2019s judge refused to grant the requested sealing order, and only agreed to anonymize the parties.\u00a0 The Plaintiffs appealed, citing that the sealing order ought to have been made in order to protect the privacy and dignity of the Plaintiff; to protect the confidential business records of Plaintiff (a doctor who was catastrophically injured in the subject accident); and to protect Plaintiff\u2019s right to solicitor-and-client privilege.<\/p>\n<p>Although the appellate court fully recognized many of the privacy concerns raised by the Plaintiffs, ultimately none of those concerns alone, or collectively, convinced the appellate court that the Rule 7.08 Motion Record required more concealment, as follows:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ol>\n<li><strong>right to privacy<\/strong>: Although protecting a person\u2019s privacy is important, it is invariably lost to some extent when a claim is brought, keeping in mind that the pleadings alone will often tell a fulsome story about the plaintiff(s) and their plight; There can be occasions when the identity of the plaintiff may cause harm or significant risk to the plaintiff, and in those rare circumstances the pleadings can be anonymized;<span class=\"\" style=\"display:block;clear:both;height: 0px;padding-top: 20px;border-top-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;\"><\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong>Making Private Settlements Public<\/strong>: Although it may seem unfair to require a party under a disability to publicly disclose their settlements whereas all other litigants can keep their settlements private and confidential, the appellate court reasoned that having the process open to public scrutiny actually protects the party under disability more than keeping their settlements private, and as noted above, if certain issues arise that cause risks, etc, the court has discretion to tailor a remedy that addresses those issues;<span class=\"\" style=\"display:block;clear:both;height: 0px;padding-top: 20px;border-top-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;\"><\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong>Protecting Solicitor and Client Privilege<\/strong>: The appellate court recognized the real concern that can arise when Plaintiff\u2019s counsel completes an Affidavit outlining the potential weaknesses in the Plaintiff\u2019s case that lead to the proposed settlement, keeping in mind that if the court does not approve the settlement, the case may proceed to trial with all of the Plaintiff\u2019s vulnerabilities exposed to the Defendant.\u00a0 However, the appellate court believed this could be adequately addressed by how Plaintiffs&#8217; counsel \u201c<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">prepare affidavits for r.7.08, so as to minimize the disclosure of privileged information, and the basis on which they may seek specific redactions in the context of specific cases where such disclosure is viewed as necessary to obtain judicial approval<\/span>.\u201d\u00a0 The appellate court also said that \u201c<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">where there is a basis for a concern that a settlement may not be finalized in the circumstances of a particular case, a motion judge has the option of ordering a temporary sealing order, which would end once the settlement is finalized<\/span>&#8220;;<span class=\"\" style=\"display:block;clear:both;height: 0px;padding-top: 20px;border-top-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;\"><\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong>Protecting the Legal Fee Arrangement<\/strong>: Although the amount and breakdown of legal fees is presumptively privileged, the appellate court reasoned that by the time the parties arrive before the court on a Rule 7.08 Motion, there is no privilege to protect, and even if there was, it must be waived so that the court can rule on the appropriateness of the legal fees being charged to the party under disability. <span class=\"\" style=\"display:block;clear:both;height: 0px;padding-top: 20px;border-top-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;\"><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As the appellate court reasoned, \u201c<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">no party is compelled to bring a r.\u00a07.08 motion.<\/span>\u201d\u00a0 Put another way, partes under disability are free to go to trial, and hash everything out, including the legal fees, in open court (ie: a very public forum).\u00a0 However, if that option is not pursued, and instead the plaintiff\u2019s guardian chooses to settle, rule 7.08 is a protective provision to ensure settlements are in the interests of the parties under disability: \u201c<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Rule 7.08, properly construed, is a benefit to the parties to the litigation, not a burden on litigation guardians and counsel.<\/span>\u201d<\/p>\n<p><em>S.E.C. v. M.P.<\/em>, 2023 ONCA 821 (CanLII)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onca\/doc\/2023\/2023onca821\/2023onca821.html\">https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onca\/doc\/2023\/2023onca821\/2023onca821.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt with a very heated issue that involved various intervenors who all had strong opinions on whether motions for court approvals of a settlement involving a party under disability, brought under Rule 7.08 (herein \u201cRule 7.08 Motions\u201d) should be presumptively sealed in order to \u201cprotect\u201d the party under&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[53,163],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-court-practice","category-personal-injury","entry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability - 360Mediations<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A settlement involving a party under disability must be approved by a Judge in open Court, but a Judge can make orders to limit public disclosure if necessary.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability - 360Mediations\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A settlement involving a party under disability must be approved by a Judge in open Court, but a Judge can make orders to limit public disclosure if necessary.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"360Mediations\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-19T19:25:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-10T20:11:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/COURT-DECISIONS-360MEDIATIONS-1x1-1.png?fit=406%2C322&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"406\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"322\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David M. Jose\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David M. Jose\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"David M. Jose\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c347754b73cc5b9c07764e2b4051a0ff\"},\"headline\":\"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-19T19:25:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-10T20:11:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\"},\"wordCount\":925,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Court Practice\",\"Personal Injury\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\",\"name\":\"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability - 360Mediations\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-19T19:25:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-10T20:11:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"A settlement involving a party under disability must be approved by a Judge in open Court, but a Judge can make orders to limit public disclosure if necessary.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"360Mediations\",\"description\":\"David M. Jose - Taking your dispute full circle to resolution....\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"360Mediations\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/360mediations.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/360Mediations-Logo-Medium.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/360mediations.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/360Mediations-Logo-Medium.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1\",\"width\":600,\"height\":600,\"caption\":\"360Mediations\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c347754b73cc5b9c07764e2b4051a0ff\",\"name\":\"David M. Jose\",\"description\":\"Full time Mediator servicing the Province of Ontario.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/author\/david-m-jose\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability - 360Mediations","description":"A settlement involving a party under disability must be approved by a Judge in open Court, but a Judge can make orders to limit public disclosure if necessary.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability - 360Mediations","og_description":"A settlement involving a party under disability must be approved by a Judge in open Court, but a Judge can make orders to limit public disclosure if necessary.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/","og_site_name":"360Mediations","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318","article_published_time":"2023-12-19T19:25:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-10T20:11:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":406,"height":322,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/COURT-DECISIONS-360MEDIATIONS-1x1-1.png?fit=406%2C322&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"David M. Jose","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David M. Jose","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/"},"author":{"name":"David M. Jose","@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c347754b73cc5b9c07764e2b4051a0ff"},"headline":"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability","datePublished":"2023-12-19T19:25:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-10T20:11:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/"},"wordCount":925,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Court Practice","Personal Injury"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/","url":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/","name":"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability - 360Mediations","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-12-19T19:25:22+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-10T20:11:29+00:00","description":"A settlement involving a party under disability must be approved by a Judge in open Court, but a Judge can make orders to limit public disclosure if necessary.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/litigation-settlements-are-generally-private-but-not-when-settlements-involve-parties-under-disability\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Litigation Settlements Are Generally Private, But Not When Settlements Involve Parties Under Disability"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/","name":"360Mediations","description":"David M. Jose - Taking your dispute full circle to resolution....","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#organization","name":"360Mediations","url":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/360mediations.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/360Mediations-Logo-Medium.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/360mediations.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/360Mediations-Logo-Medium.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1","width":600,"height":600,"caption":"360Mediations"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mail.360mediations.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c347754b73cc5b9c07764e2b4051a0ff","name":"David M. Jose","description":"Full time Mediator servicing the Province of Ontario.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/360Mediations-120028596572318"],"url":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/author\/david-m-jose\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10289"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10315,"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10289\/revisions\/10315"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.360mediations.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}